Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:3014Hits:20922413Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID051845
Title ProperPaying for peace: the Oslo process and the limits of American foreign aid
LanguageENG
AuthorLasensky, Scott
PublicationSpring 2004.
Summary / Abstract (Note)American foreign aid has been essential for both cementing and sustaining efforts to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict since the 1970s. During the Oslo process, aid was designed primarily to build public constituencies to support the negotiations. However, aid quickly became a bandage for a deteriorating Palestinian economy weighed down by corruption, damaged by violence, and stifled by Israeli closures. Rather than serve its original purpose, aid became a crutch for an unsteady process that collapsed following the 2000 Camp David summit. Unlike in other Arab-Israeli negotiations, where aid has been more effective, the Oslo process highlights the limits of foreign aid as an instrument of statecraft
`In' analytical NoteMiddle East Journal Vol. 58, No.2; Spring 2004: p 210-234
Journal SourceMiddle East Journal 2004-04 58, 2
Key WordsForeign Aid ;  Peace Process-Middle East ;  Middle East-Peace Process ;  Oslo ;  United States-International Relations-Middle East