| ID | 060768 |
| Title Proper | Five Bad Options for Iraq |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Byman, Daniel |
| Publication | 2005. |
| Description | p7-32 |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The current US approach towards Iraq is fundamentally flawed and increasingly difficult to sustain. There five options: continuing to muddle through with the current approach; expanding the size of the deployed military forces; shifting towards counterinsurgency operations; drawing down the overall force size and using the remainder for a more limited mission; and complete withdrawal. Of these, expansion is not feasible, and a withdrawal could prove disastrous. Shifting toward counterinsurgency offers many benefits, but it is highly unlikely that the United States would do it properly. By default, a limited drawdown represents the ‘least bad’ option. It would enable the United States to preserve some influence and continue to target the jihadists, but reduce the tremendous costs of continued operations. |
| `In' analytical Note | Survival Vol. 47, No.1; Spring 2005: p7-32 |
| Journal Source | Survival Vol: 47 No 1 |
| Key Words | Iraq War ; Counter Insurgency ; United States |