| ID | 072141 |
| Title Proper | Rift |
| Other Title Information | explaining Europe's divergent Iraq policies in the run-up of the American-led war on Iraq |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Schuster, Jurgen ; Maier, Herbert |
| Publication | 2006. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | America's plan to attack Iraq split Europe down the middle. Why did European countries take such different stances toward the Bush administration's policy? This article examines three different approaches, each rooted in one of international relations (IRs) prominent schools of thought, with regard to their explanatory power in this specific puzzle. Firstly, it shows that public opinion (utilitarian-liberal approach) cannot account for whether a state joined the "coalition of the willing" or not. Secondly, it demonstrates that in Eastern Europe systemic forces of power relations (neorealist approach) are suitable for explaining state behavior, but not in Western Europe. Thirdly, it shows that the ideological orientations of governments (liberal-constructivist approach) were the decisive factor in determining whether a state supported the United States in Western Europe, but not in Eastern Europe. These results offer some interesting insights for the theoretical debate in IRs theory and foreign policy analysis, which are discussed in the final section of the article. In regard to foreign policy analysis, for example, the results of this study propose to "bring political parties in." |
| `In' analytical Note | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol. 2, No. 3; Jul 2006: p223-244 |
| Journal Source | Foreign Policy Analysis Vol: 2 No 3 |
| Key Words | United States ; Iraq War ; Europe ; International Relations Theory ; Foreign Policy Analysis |