Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:807Hits:21504302Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID073370
Title ProperWhen to risk it? Institutions, ambitions, and the decision to run for the US House
LanguageENG
AuthorMaestas, Cherie D ;  Fulton, Sarah ;  Maisel, L Sandy ;  Stone, Walter J
Publication2006.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The health of any democratic system depends on political ambition to generate a steady supply of quality candidates for office. Because most models of candidate entry assume ambition rather than model it, previous research fails to understand its roots in individual and institutional characteristics. We develop a two-stage model of progressive behavior that distinguishes between the formation of ambition for higher office and the decision to enter a particular race. Using data from a survey of state legislators, we demonstrate that the intrinsic costs and benefits associated with running for and holding higher office shape ambitions but do not influence the decision to run. For progressively ambitious legislators, the second-stage decision is a strategic choice about when to run rather than whether to run. Our research highlights how institutional characteristics that foster progressive ambition also increase the likelihood that national or local political conditions will be translated into meaningful choices at the ballot box.
`In' analytical NoteAmerican Political Science Review Vol. 100, No. 2; May 2006: p195-208
Journal SourceAmerican Political Science Review Vol: 100 No 2
Key WordsUnited States ;  Political System ;  Elections