ID | 079907 |
Title Proper | Social-property regimes and the uneven and combined development of nationalist practices |
Language | ENG |
Author | Dufour, Frederick Guillaume |
Publication | 2007. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Concepts like `nation', `society', and `culture' name bits and threaten to turn names into things. Only by understanding these names as bundles of relationships, and by placing them back into the field from which they were abstracted, can we hope to avoid misleading inferences and increase our share of understanding. (Wolf, 1997: 3) Theories of International Relations have often shied away from apprehending the historicity of modern nationalism. Inversely, theories of nationalism have not spent much time theorizing the inter-national. The analysis of the relationships among social relations, international orders and nationalism has fallen in the cracks between the field of IR and the field of comparative nationalism. In the context of a renewal of interest for the historical sociology of the international, the analysis of these relations remains of particular relevance. In this article, the author builds on Benno Teschke, Justin Rosenberg and Hannes Lacher's theorization of modern sovereignty, capitalism and the uneven and combined development of International Relations to recast the socio-historical conditions of emergence and diffusion of the modern national form |
`In' analytical Note | European Journal of International Relations Vol. 13, No.4; Dec 2007: p583-604 |
Journal Source | European Journal of International Relations Vol. 13, No.4; Dec 2007: p583-604 |
Key Words | Historical Sociology ; Identity ; Nationalism ; Social-Property Relations ; Uneven and Combined Development |