Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:3976Hits:20959724Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID080503
Title ProperNuclear weapons and intergenerational exploitation
LanguageENG
AuthorRendall, Matthew
Publication2007.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Nuclear weapons' defenders claim that they lower the risk of war, at the price of devastation if war breaks out. Sooner or later, however, on a realist analysis, catastrophic nuclear war is sure to come. Nuclear deterrence thus buys us a better chance of dying in bed, while each post-holocaust generation will have to pick up the pieces. If the nuclear optimists are wrong, hoping to spread or perpetuate nuclear deterrence is foolish; but if they are right, it is exploitative. Like big cars and cheap flights, nuclear deterrence benefits us at the expense of future generations. States that do not already have the bomb should not get it. Britain and France should consider disarmament, while Russia and the United States should slash their arsenals. Minimum deterrence should be equally stable, but most nuclear optimists, being neorealists who hold that war will continue, should want deep cuts even if it is not.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol, 16 No. 4; Oct-Dec 2007: p525-554
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol, 16 No. 4; Oct-Dec 2007: p525-554
Key WordsNuclear Weapons ;  Nuclear Deterrence


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text