Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:4692Hits:25718779Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID083222
Title ProperIs there an aid-for-participation deal?: US economic and military aid policy to coalition forces (non)participants
LanguageENG
AuthorTago, Atsushi
Publication2008.
Summary / Abstract (Note)There is an empirical evidence of an aid-for-policy deal between the United States and other states; the United States has utilized aid programs to promote affirmative votes in the UN General Assembly and to maintain an alliance relationship with strategically important states. However, whether there is a systematic evidence of an aid-for-participation deal remains inconclusive. Does the United States generally utilize its foreign aid to reward the contribution of troops to the US-led multinational forces and to punish the lack of contribution? The author argues that US foreign aid is used to prevent free-riding in coalition participation. To test the argument, I examined whether states were punished or rewarded by the United States for their behavior in sending or failing to send troops to 15 post-Second World War US-led coalition forces. The results show that the United States punished states for unexpected nonparticipation, but did not always provide rewards for support
`In' analytical NoteInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 8, No.3; 2008: p379-398
Journal SourceInternational Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 8, No.3; 2008: p379-398
Key WordsUnited States ;  United Nation ;  Alliance