ID | 083222 |
Title Proper | Is there an aid-for-participation deal?: US economic and military aid policy to coalition forces (non)participants |
Language | ENG |
Author | Tago, Atsushi |
Publication | 2008. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | There is an empirical evidence of an aid-for-policy deal between the United States and other states; the United States has utilized aid programs to promote affirmative votes in the UN General Assembly and to maintain an alliance relationship with strategically important states. However, whether there is a systematic evidence of an aid-for-participation deal remains inconclusive. Does the United States generally utilize its foreign aid to reward the contribution of troops to the US-led multinational forces and to punish the lack of contribution? The author argues that US foreign aid is used to prevent free-riding in coalition participation. To test the argument, I examined whether states were punished or rewarded by the United States for their behavior in sending or failing to send troops to 15 post-Second World War US-led coalition forces. The results show that the United States punished states for unexpected nonparticipation, but did not always provide rewards for support |
`In' analytical Note | International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 8, No.3; 2008: p379-398 |
Journal Source | International Relations of the Asia-Pacific Vol. 8, No.3; 2008: p379-398 |
Key Words | United States ; United Nation ; Alliance |