| ID | 087952 |
| Title Proper | Three Faces of NATO |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Betts, Richard K |
| Publication | 2009. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | THE NORTH Atlantic Treaty Organization is one of the most successful alliances of all time, but after the cold war and the successful completion of its mission, NATO suffered an identity crisis. It now has three main functions and self-images that compete with each other. The first persona is the enforcer, the pacifier of conflicts beyond the region's borders; the second is the gentlemen's club for liberal and liberalizing countries of the West; and the third is the residual function of an anti-Russia alliance.
One must wonder why, with the end of the cold war, NATO did not dissolve. How do we explain the organization's transformation and vitality at the end of the twentieth century? NATO did not retire after victory because it was not just any old alliance. Rather, it had become a genuine institution, complete with transnational, integrated command structures, a permanent bureaucracy, buildings, regular meetings and ceremonies, its own logo, website and so on. |
| `In' analytical Note | National Interest Vol., No.100; Mar/Apr 2009: p31-38 |
| Journal Source | National Interest Vol., No.100; Mar/Apr 2009: p31-38 |
| Key Words | Three Faces ; NATO ; Anti - Russia Alliance. |