Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:972Hits:21520289Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID090444
Title ProperWhen preferences and commitments collide
Other Title Informationthe effect of relative partisan shifts on international treaty compliance
LanguageENG
AuthorGrieco, Joseph M ;  Gelpi, Christopher F ;  Warren, T Camber
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)In this article, we demonstrate that changes in the partisan orientation of a country's executive branch influence the likelihood that the government of that country complies with international legal commitments aimed at integration of capital markets. We argue that relative shifts in executive partisan orientation, whether toward the left or toward the right, represent important shifts in "national preferences" that have heretofore been absent from statistical models of treaty compliance. Using a matching estimator combined with a genetic algorithm to maximize balance in our sample, we show that the causal impact of a state signing Article VIII of the IMF Articles of Agreement is conditioned by right-to-left shifts in partisan orientation. The evidence indicates that such preference changes reduce the constraining effects of Article VIII but also indicates that Article VIII continues to exercise significant causal effects even in the face of relative shifts in executive partisan orientation.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Organization Vol. 63, No. 2; Spring 2009: p.341-355
Journal SourceInternational Organization Vol. 63, No. 2; Spring 2009: p.341-355
Key WordsInternational Treaty Compliance ;  International Legal Commitments ;  Capital Markets ;  Commitments Collide


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text