Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:431Hits:26003965Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID091662
Title ProperPartition of contingency
Other Title Informationpublic discourse in Bengal, 1946-1947
LanguageENG
AuthorRoy, Haimanti
Publication2009.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The historiography on the Partition of Bengal has tended to see it as a culmination of long-term trends of Hindu and Muslim communalism within the province. This essay offers a counter-narrative to the 'inevitability' of the Partition by focusing on Bengali public discourse in the months leading up to the Partition. The possibility of a division generated a large-scale debate amongst the educated in Bengal and they articulated their views by sending numerous letters to leading newspapers, district political and civic organizations and sometimes published pamphlets for local consumption. A critical examination of these public debates for and against Partition reveals the countdown to August 1947 as a period of multiple possibilities. Rather than being pre-determined, the stands for a separate or a United Bengal were contingent in nature. Understanding the genesis provides the starting point and the necessary corrective to evaluate India's path to post-colonial nationhood
`In' analytical NoteModern Asian Studies Vol. 43, No. 6; Nov 2009: p1355-1384
Journal SourceModern Asian Studies Vol. 43, No. 6; Nov 2009: p1355-1384
Key WordsPartition ;  Contingency ;  Public Discourse - Bengal ;  Nationalist India