| ID | 093945 |
| Title Proper | Nuclear terrorism redux |
| Other Title Information | conventionalists, skeptics, and the margin of safety |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Masse, Todd |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The casual media observer might well believe that nuclear terrorism is highly likely in the United States and it is a question of "when, not if." This is the view of the "conventionalists." But there is a second school, the "skeptics," that believes the nuclear world is more secure than at any time in history and that the possibility of a nuclear terrorist event is overstated. This article articulates arguments made by these two schools of thought and develops a framework for analyzing the issue. It concludes that while enhanced national and international vigilance against nuclear terrorism is necessary, when viewed through an historical lens, today's margin of nuclear safety may actually be higher than in the past. |
| `In' analytical Note | Orbis Vol. 54, No. 2; Spr 2010: 302-319 |
| Journal Source | Orbis Vol. 54, No. 2; Spr 2010: 302-319 |
| Key Words | Nuclear Terrorism ; Nuclear Safety ; Nuclear Weapons |