| ID | 095486 |
| Title Proper | Preserving non-democracies |
| Other Title Information | leaders and state institutions in the Middle East |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Kamrava, Mehran |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Authoritarian elites often prolong their tenure in office by engaging in wholesale institutional change. Whether inherited or created from scratch, state institutions in non-democracies are meant to solidify elite cohesion and political control, pacify potential opponents, and create coalitions that support the state. Nevertheless, autocrats keep a watchful eye on these institutions, and if they change internally in directions that may seem threatening to state leaders, the institutions are changed or even disbanded. Change to the institutions of the non-democratic state is caused by a combination of deliberate decisions and institutional crafting by state leaders on the one hand, and by institutional layering and changes initiated from within the institutions rhemselves on the other. As the cases of the National Assembly in Kuwait, the Revolutionary Command Council in Egypt, and the Revolutionary Council in Iran demonstrate, when and if state institutions become inefficient or are seen as a threat by authoritarian leaders, then state leaders once again take control in determining their shape and configuration. Non-democracies are often preserved through purposive institutional change. |
| `In' analytical Note | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 46, No. 2; Mar 2010: p.251 - 270 |
| Journal Source | Middle Eastern Studies Vol. 46, No. 2; Mar 2010: p.251 - 270 |
| Key Words | Middle East ; Non - Democracies ; Kuwait ; Revolutionary Command Council ; Egypt |