| ID | 098451 |
| Title Proper | Development of military doctrine |
| Other Title Information | the particular case of small states |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Bjerga, Kjell Inge ; Haaland, Torunn Laugen |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | In this article, the development of the Norwegian Armed Forces' Joint Doctrine of 2007 is analysed in order to illustrate some distinct characteristics of the development of small state doctrines. First, small states have limited freedom and limited institutional capacity to realise their own ideas about the use of their military forces. Furthermore, their contribution of forces to multilateral military operations signals political support for an institution (NATO) or a cause, but they are too small to make a real difference to the military operation. Hence, the operational experiences of these forces differ from those of larger countries. The stakes are lower, and they are unlikely to suffer military defeat in a decisive way. They may suffer losses, but they will not lose a war. As a consequence, small state doctrines at the strategic level have become detached from the question of operational effectiveness and are instead utilised for the purpose of promoting political, legal and ethical messages to the military, to a domestic audience, and to international allies. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 33, No. 4; Aug 2010: p.505 - 533 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Strategic Studies Vol. 33, No. 4; Aug 2010: p.505 - 533 |
| Key Words | Military Doctrine ; Small States ; RMA ; Norway |