| ID | 098569 |
| Title Proper | Comparison of fixed versus variable biofuels incentives |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Tyne, Wallace E ; Taheripour, Farzad ; Perkis, David |
| Publication | 2010. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | We evaluated several variants of a variable biofuel subsidy and compared them with the fixed subsidy and Renewable Fuel Standard using two different modeling approaches. First we used a partial equilibrium model encompassing crude oil, gasoline, ethanol, corn, and ethanol by-products. Second, we used a stochastic simulation model of a prototypical ethanol plant. From the partial equilibrium analysis, it appears the variable subsidy provides a safety net for ethanol producers when oil prices are low; yet, it does not put undue pressure on corn prices when oil prices are high. At high oil prices, the level of ethanol production is driven by market forces. From the plant level stochastic analysis, essentially the same conclusions are reached. As with the fixed subsidy, the variable subsidy can increase the net present value (NPV) sufficiently to encourage investment, but with lower risk for the producer, lower probability of a loss from the investment, and often lower expected cost to government. Finally, in the US, the ethanol industry is up against a blending limit called the blend wall. If the blending wall remains in place and no way around it is found, it does not matter much what other policy options are used. |
| `In' analytical Note | Energy Policy Vol. 38, No. 10; Oct 2010: p5530-5540 |
| Journal Source | Energy Policy Vol. 38, No. 10; Oct 2010: p5530-5540 |
| Key Words | Ethanol Policy ; Biofuel Incentives |