Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:3377Hits:20942069Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID098764
Title ProperGreat oxymoron
Other Title InformationJus In Bello violations as legitimate non-forcible measures of self-defense: the post-disengagement Israeli measures towards Gaza as a case study
LanguageENG
AuthorSolomon, Solon
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Modern warfare and the war on terror against mainly non-State actors have obliged States to resort to innovative measures which blur the limits between jus in bello and jus ad bellum and create a legal oxymoron where the same measures constitute international law violations should they be perceived under jus in bello and legitimate means of self-defense should they be seen under the lens of self-defense and jus ad bellum. In order to demonstrate the particular axiom the note will use the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a factual and normative framework and will put under its kaleidoscope the post-disengagement Israeli measures towards Gaza.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 9, No. 3; Sep 2010: p501-536
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 9, No. 3; Sep 2010: p501-536
Key WordsModern Warfare ;  Oxymoron ;  Bello Violations ;  Self-Defense ;  Israel ;  Gaza ;  Human Right