Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:753Hits:20881297Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID099252
Title ProperDealing with surplus emissions in the climate negotiations after Copenhagen
Other Title Informationwhat are the options for compromise?
LanguageENG
AuthorElzen, Michel den ;  Roelfsema, Mark ;  Slingerland, Stephan
Publication2010.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper analyses the environmental and financial consequences of various strategies of dealing with surplus emission allowances in the aftermath of the Copenhagen Accord. This topic remains relevant, in particular, with respect to the Russian negotiation position, as this country is the largest holder of surplus emissions. It is concluded that not addressing the surplus problem is not a feasible negotiation option, as the sheer size of the surpluses would jeopardise the environmental integrity of any future agreement. Cancelling surpluses against Russia's will, though viable, is not desirable, as it might well lead to this country opting out of this climate treaty. Three options for compromise have been selected and analysed here: (1) stricter targets for Annex I countries; (2) strategic reserve for Russia; (3) institutionalising optimal banking. It is concluded that, whereas option 1 is environmentally the best, in the present political context it is probably less feasible. The other two options, although environmentally suboptimal, seem politically more favourable. Our analysis suggests that maximal revenues for surplus-holding countries arise by releasing only a limited amount of surplus credits to the market. The institutionalisation of this effect could be a key lever to a politically feasible agreement on surplus emissions.
`In' analytical NoteEnergy Policy Vol. 38, No. 11; Nov 2010: p.6615-6628
Journal SourceEnergy Policy Vol. 38, No. 11; Nov 2010: p.6615-6628
Key WordsEmission Surplus ;  Copenhagen Accord ;  Reduction Pledges