ID | 099573 |
Title Proper | Defending immanent critique |
Language | ENG |
Author | Sabia, Dan |
Publication | 2010. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article develops, illustrates, and defends a conception of immanent critique. Immanent critique is construed as a form of hermeneutical practice and second-order political and normative criticism. The common charge that immanent critique is a form of philosophical conventionalism necessarily committed to value relativism and to the rejection of transcultural and cosmopolitan norms is denied. But immanent critique insists that meaningful and potentially efficacious criticism must be connected to relevant criteria and understandings internal to the culture or social order at which the criticism is directed. The complaint that this demand will likely limit political and moral criticism is also denied, and the ability of immanent critique to develop from convention unconventional thinking is defended and demonstrated. |
`In' analytical Note | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 5; Oct 2010: p684-711 |
Journal Source | Political Theory Vol. 38, No. 5; Oct 2010: p684-711 |
Key Words | Immanent Critique ; Immanent Criticism ; Hermeneutics ; Social Change ; Conventionalism ; Human Rights ; Slavery |