Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:3999Hits:20980203Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID101916
Title ProperInterests, ideas and ideology
Other Title InformationSouth Africa's policy on darfur
LanguageENG
AuthorNathan, Laurie
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Under former President Mbeki, South Africa provoked international dismay and criticism when it tried to block United Nations censure of Burma, Sudan, and Zimbabwe for gross human rights abuses. In the case of Sudan, Pretoria stood accused of turning a blind eye to Khartoum's excessive and indiscriminate violence in Darfur, betraying South Africa's own struggle for democracy and commitment to promoting human rights. This article seeks to shed light on Pretoria's foreign policy by explaining its position on Darfur and exploring the relationship between ideas and interests in shaping the policy. I argue that the position on Darfur was not unfathomable or realist, as some observers claimed, but was based on the core ideas of South Africa's foreign policy: the African Renaissance; quiet diplomacy as the most effective means of dealing with pariah regimes; solidarity with African governments under pressure from the West; and an anti-imperialist paradigm that provided the lens through which the government viewed the global order, defined the country's interests, and conceptualized human rights. Whereas most studies of Pretoria's foreign conduct pay little heed to the policies of the ruling party, I show that the conduct flowed logically from the party's anti-imperialist ideology.
`In' analytical NoteAfrican Affairs Vol. 110, No. 4; Jan 2011: p55-84
Journal SourceAfrican Affairs Vol. 110, No. 4; Jan 2011: p55-84
Key WordsSouth Africa ;  Ideology ;  South Africa - Policy ;  Darfur ;  Burma ;  Zimbabwe ;  Foreign Policy


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text