ID | 103221 |
Title Proper | UN Peacekeeping and the international private military and security industry |
Language | ENG |
Author | Spearin, Christopher |
Publication | 2011. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | UN peacekeeping continues to confront qualitative and quantitative difficulties. Arguments in favour of using private military and security companies (PMSCs), particularly those referring to the 1990s-era when Executive Outcomes was operating, have been aired. The article examines earlier operational arguments for PMSC participation in UN peacekeeping, which at times have been reintroduced in more recent assertions: (1) PMSCs have better organization, training, and equipment; (2) they have a heightened willingness to apply force to serve UN mandates; and (3) they enjoy enhanced readiness to respond. The article argues, however, that it would be difficult for contemporary PMSCs to respond effectively, quickly, and robustly should the UN turn to them for enforcement operations. State and market pressures have conditioned PMSCs to operate in a manner dissimilar to that in the 1990s. |
`In' analytical Note | International Peacekeeping Vol. 18, No. 2; Apr 2011: p.196 - 209 |
Journal Source | International Peacekeeping Vol. 18, No. 2; Apr 2011: p.196 - 209 |
Key Words | UN Peacekeeping ; International Private Military ; Security Industry ; Private Military ; Security Companies |