Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:655Hits:24490508Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID103358
Title ProperCommittee bias in legislatures with a high degree of party cohesion
Other Title Informationevidence from Danish municipalities
LanguageENG
AuthorBaekgaard, Martin
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The institution of committees in democratic legislatures has for years been said to bias policy making because the preferences of committee members differ from, and are more alike than, those of other legislators due to self-selection to the committees. Based on an analysis of United States Senate committees, Hall and Grofman suggested in 1990 that the preferences of committee members primarily diverge from, and are more alike than, those of non-committee members on policy issues that are salient to constituencies or at least to an easily definable segment of constituencies. This article argues that the logic of Hall and Grofman should in fact be reversed in legislatures characterised by highly cohesive parties. Accordingly, the main hypothesis is that in such legislatures the preferences of committee members are more likely to be alike than those of non-committee members in the committees that work with policy issues of less salience to constituencies. Using a large-scale comparative design comprising data collected in 2008 on the spending preferences of 1,348 Danish local politicians, evidence is found supporting this hypothesis. This finding points to the importance of considering the role of parties when assessing committee bias.
`In' analytical NoteEuropean Journal of Political Research Vol. 50, No. 3; May 2011: p315-335
Journal SourceEuropean Journal of Political Research Vol. 50, No. 3; May 2011: p315-335
Key WordsDanish ;  Municipalities ;  United States - Congress ;  Homogeneity