Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1239Hits:21155161Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID105164
Title ProperProportionality and international humanitarian law
Other Title Informationan economic analysis
LanguageENG
AuthorHorvitz, Sigmund A ;  Nehs, Robert M
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Protocol I, Additional to the Geneva Conventions, in Article 57, mandates the rule of proportionality governing military attacks. The literature on international humanitarian law, however, reflects a widely-held view that this mandate is often ignored. Motivated by that view, this paper discusses three strategies, which, by appealing to ubiquitous social values, can encourage respect for and, in turn, compliance with the proportionality rule. These strategies are: first, interpreting a proportional attack as one which requires a rational and equitable balance, in cost-benefit terms, of the conflicting military and humanitarian interests, respectively, of the attacking and the attacked Parties (without sacrificing the desired military advantage of the former); second, requiring a planned attack to be 'objectively proportional', as measured by the preferences, quantified in statistical terms, of the 'reasonable military commander'; and, third, requiring the attacking Party to compensate victims for incidental civilian damage resulting from an attack that is not objectively proportional. Observance of the principle of proportionality depends upon voluntary compliance, induced by respect for this principle, since compliance is not compelled under current international law.
`In' analytical NoteGlobal Change Peace and Security Vol. 23, No. 2; Jun 2011: p195-206
Journal SourceGlobal Change Peace and Security Vol. 23, No. 2; Jun 2011: p195-206
Key WordsProportionality ;  International Humanitarian Law ;  Economic Analysis


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text