| ID | 105646 |
| Title Proper | Meaning of materiality |
| Other Title Information | reconsidering the materialism of gramscian IR |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Mccarthy, Daniel R |
| Publication | 2011. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Gramsican approaches in International Relations (IR) have sought to outline the relationship between ideas and material forces in the construction of world order. Scholars working within this broad school have sought to emphasise that ideas are material forces, and must be considered as concrete historical structures (Cox, 1987) central to the establishment of particular historical and hegemonic blocs. This literature has primarily focused on the discursive construction of hegemony by international elites and the impact this has on political practices. While these insights are important in understanding the construction of world order, it is necessary to extend them to include the creation of actual physical structures - that is, it is vital to link the ideational aspects of hegemony with actual material processes. I will argue that a consideration of the role of technology provides an ideal vehicle for this process, building on the preliminary work of Bieler and Morton in this regard (2008). Technological structures are the product of particular cultural values and embed these cultural values within their very structure. Physical material factors thereby express ideational values constructed by specific social forces. Social practices are thus not only a function of the dominance of certain ideological formations, but also the product of the material environment itself and the manner in which the human metabolism with nature must function through these physical constructions. |
| `In' analytical Note | Review of International Studies Vol. 37, No. 3; Jul 2011: p1215-1234 |
| Journal Source | Review of International Studies Vol. 37, No. 3; Jul 2011: p1215-1234 |
| Key Words | Materiality ; Materialism ; International Relations ; IR ; International Relations Theory |