Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:640Hits:24723515Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID106866
Title ProperMore of the same or something different
Other Title Informationpreliminary observations on the contribution of universal periodic review with reference to the Chinese experience
LanguageENG
AuthorSmith, Rhona K M
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Using the People's Republic of China as a case study, this paper will consider the extent to which the Human Rights Council's Universal Periodic Review process consolidates and reinforces the pre-existing treaty-monitoring system of the United Nations. Is universal periodic review simply more of the same (comments on a self-evaluation report submitted by the State, the rigor being erratic); or is the process something different, either more or less effective? Furthermore, is there evidence of consistency of practice within the UN itself? While the first full cycle of universal periodic review concludes late 2011, it is possible to draw tentative conclusions on the system at this stage.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 10, No. 3; Aug 2011: p565-586
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 10, No. 3; Aug 2011: p565-586
Key WordsChina ;  UN ;  United Nations ;  Human Right