Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1261Hits:21483711Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID107645
Title ProperOther side of the COIN
Other Title Informationprivate security companies and counterinsurgency operations
LanguageENG
AuthorPetersohn, Ulrich
Publication2011.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The Iraq War was a watershed regarding the scope of battlefield support by Private Security Companies (PSC). Skeptics soon raised concerns about these new actors being an impediment to the success of the very same operations they are meant to support. According to the critics, PSCs are grist to the mill for insurgents as they employ aggressive tactics and thereby alienate the population, cause credibility problems because they enjoy impunity, and increase coordination problems since they are not subordinated under the military chain of command. This article argues that this is not a necessary result of their employment, but rather the consequence of a lack of preparedness to operate alongside PSCs. However, the military is accustomed to adapting to new unexpected circumstances. Hence, when problems occurred, the armed forces underwent a trial and error learning process that improved PSC employment. The empirical picture supports this view. Initially, the counterinsurgency effort did indeed suffer from the actions, lack of oversight, and lack of coordination of PSCs. However, over the course of the Iraq War, most of the shortfalls were either improved significantly or even resolved.
`In' analytical NoteStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 34, No.10; Oct 2011: p.782-801
Journal SourceStudies in Conflict and Terrorism Vol. 34, No.10; Oct 2011: p.782-801
Key WordsIraq War ;  Private Security Companies ;  Counterinsurgency Operations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text