| ID | 111509 |
| Title Proper | Judging democracy in Pakistan |
| Other Title Information | conflict between the executive and judiciary |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Waseem, Mohammad |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article deals with the judicialization of politics in Pakistan under the Supreme Court Chief Justice Choudhry (2009-). Confrontation between the executive and judiciary under him led to speculation about the imminent collapse of the democratic system, given the history of military take-over in the country. The use of judicial review, whereby the Court exercised the power of interpreting the Constitution with impunity, was widely criticized as an attempt to encroach on the territory of the legislature through case law. At the institutional level, the Court sought to exercise veto power over the appointment of judges and to deny the right of oversight to any government agency. The Court's pursuit of public interest litigation through frequent suo motu actions taken in a populist mode led to brinkmanship on the part of the executive and judiciary. Despite this power play, the Court's operations fell into the category of modus operandi, instead of being a fight to the finish. However, the Court's pursuit of judicial reform relating to cheap and speedy justice and accountability of the higher judiciary remained far from satisfactory. |
| `In' analytical Note | Contemporary South Asia Vol. 20, No.1; Mar 2012: p.19-31 |
| Journal Source | Contemporary South Asia Vol. 20, No.1; Mar 2012: p.19-31 |
| Key Words | Pakistan ; Supreme Court ; Chief Justice Choudhry ; Judicial Review ; Independence of Judiciary |