Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2645Hits:20996380Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID111737
Title ProperShaming and blaming
Other Title Informationusing events data to assess the impact of human rights INGOs
LanguageENG
AuthorMurdie, Amanda M ;  Davis, David R
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Do the "shaming" activities of HROs (human rights international non-governmental organizations) have a direct influence on state behavior? We argue, consistent with existing scholarship, that states targeted or "shamed" by these organizations do improve their human rights practices. However, mere shaming is not enough. Improvements in human rights practices result from the interaction of shaming by HROs with (i) a domestic presence of HROs within the targeted state and/or (ii) pressure by third-party states, individuals, and organizations. Using a new data set of the shaming events of more than 400 HROs toward governments, we test these propositions quantitatively and find widespread support for the arguments. This research provides the first global quantitative evidence of the conditional importance of HRO shaming in transnational advocacy efforts.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 56, No.1; Mar 2012: p.1-16
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 56, No.1; Mar 2012: p.1-16
Key WordsHuman Rights ;  Human Rights International Non - Governmental Organizations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text