Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2759Hits:20945883Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID111963
Title ProperMaking of the Pundit, 2010
Other Title Informationwhen strong ties trump weak ones
LanguageENG
AuthorMusgrave, Paul
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Many observers have argued that social media such as Facebook and Twitter will help opposition activists coordinate and overcome authoritarian regimes; others believe that such tools will have little impact. Evidence from the "Arab Spring" is inconclusive, with advocates for each position finding support in the events in Tunisia, Egypt, and elsewhere. When does social media help political movements succeed? Motivated by an experience serving as a "campaign manager" for a colleague's bid to become the Washington Post's "Next Great Pundit," I argue that relying on Internet-based social networking tools (such as Facebook and Twitter) may lead campaigns to perform more poorly when the regime is able to change the election's rules in mid-campaign. Consequently, researchers observing only the messages broadcast by social media will miss the true coordination taking place, which happens through channels unobservable to the regime. Examples from Middle Eastern politics suggest that real-world political activists recognize these distinctions and adjust their messaging accordingly.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 45, No.2; Apr 2012: p. 265-269
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 45, No.2; Apr 2012: p. 265-269
Key WordsSocial Media ;  Twitter ;  Arab Spring ;  Middle Eastern Politics