| ID | 112863 |
| Title Proper | Making diplomacy work |
| Other Title Information | coercion and conciliation in the First North Korean nuclear crisis |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Jackson, Van |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | When is a two-track policy approach of coercion and conciliation more or less likely to achieve its target objective? The first North Korean nuclear crisis of 1993-94 reveals that a U.S. policy approach combining coercive and conciliatory diplomacy contributed to near-term U.S. policy objectives when conciliation was offered to North Korea in order to signal benign intent. This case also reveals two additional conditions that can hinder a two-track policy from achieving its policy aims: shifting how the objectives of coercive signals and actions are prioritized throughout the course of a crisis, and relying on international institutions and foreign governments for the implementation of a two-track policy. |
| `In' analytical Note | Comparative Strategy Vol. 31, No.2; Apr-Jun 2012: p.171-187 |
| Journal Source | Comparative Strategy Vol. 31, No.2; Apr-Jun 2012: p.171-187 |
| Key Words | North Korean Nuclear Crisis ; North Korea ; Diplomacy ; United States |