Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:704Hits:21035475Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID113755
Title ProperOffense-defense balance, war duration, and the security dilemma
LanguageENG
AuthorNilsson, Marco
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The systemic offense-defense theory argues that the security dilemma and the risk of war become doubly severe in offense-dominant eras in the state system. However, the theory assumes in support of its main argument that wars are shorter when offense has the advantage. This article empirically tests the expected connection between the systemic offense-defense balance and war duration. A statistical analysis of wars 1817-1992 disconfirms the theory's expectations. The article then draws different conclusions about the severity of the security dilemma when offense is dominant: both arms racing and the fear of aggression that the security dilemma thrives on should be less severe than offense-defense theorists assume.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 56, No.3; Jun 2012: p.467-489
Journal SourceJournal of Conflict Resolution Vol. 56, No.3; Jun 2012: p.467-489
Key WordsWar Duration ;  Offense - Defense Balance ;  Security Dilemma


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text