| ID | 114594 |
| Title Proper | Politics for the day after tomorrow |
| Other Title Information | the logic of apocalypse in global climate politics |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Methmann, Chris ; Rothe, Delf |
| Publication | 2012. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | The recent global climate change discourse is a prominent example of a securitization of environmental issues. While the problem is often framed in the language of existentialism, crisis or even apocalypse, climate discourses rarely result in exceptional or extraordinary measures, but rather put forth a governmental scheme of piecemeal and technocratic solutions often associated with risk management. This article argues that this seeming paradox is no accident but follows from a politics of apocalypse that combines two logics - those of security and risk - which in critical security studies are often treated as two different animals. Drawing on the hegemony theory of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, however, this article shows that the two are inherently connected. In the same way as the Christian pastorate could not do without apocalyptic imageries, today's micro-politics of risk depends on a series of macro-securitizations that enable and legitimize the governmental machinery. This claim is backed up by an inquiry into current global discourses of global climate change regarding mitigation, adaptation and security implications. Although these discourses are often framed through the use of apocalyptic images, they rarely result in exceptional or extraordinary measures, but rather advance a governmental scheme of risk management. Tracing the relationship between security and risk in these discourses, we use the case of climate change to highlight the relevance of our theoretical argument. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Dialogue Vol. 43, No.4; Aug 2012: p.323-344 |
| Journal Source | Security Dialogue Vol. 43, No.4; Aug 2012: p.323-344 |
| Key Words | Catastrophe ; Securitization ; Climate Change ; Risk ; Hegemony ; Copenhagen School |