Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1197Hits:21154550Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID116181
Title ProperOffshore balancing thesis reconsidered
Other Title Informationrealism, the balance of power in Europe, and America's decision for war in 1917
LanguageENG
AuthorJackson, Galen
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)According to John Mearsheimer, the United States entered the First World War because the Wilson administration believed the Triple Entente was on the verge of defeat. As a result, he claims, the Americans entered the war to prevent Germany from becoming a regional hegemon in Europe. A careful and targeted examination of the relevant primary sources, however, demonstrates that Washington was largely unaware of the plight of the Allied powers in the spring of 1917; therefore, the argument that the United States was acting as an offshore balancer at this time is unconvincing. This article shows that unit-level factors and statecraft can play a larger role in international relations than structural realist theory allows and makes an empirical contribution to the World War I literature by demonstrating that balance of power considerations were not a major factor in the Wilson administration's decision for war.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Studies Vol. 21, No.3; Jul-Sep 2012: p.455-489
Journal SourceSecurity Studies Vol. 21, No.3; Jul-Sep 2012: p.455-489
Key WordsUnited States ;  World War I ;  Germany ;  Europe ;  Regional Hegemon ;  International Relations


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text