| ID | 117279 |
| Title Proper | Energy and behavioral impacts of integrative retrofits for residential buildings |
| Other Title Information | what is at stake for building energy policy reforms in northern China? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Peng Xu ; Tengfang Xu ; Shen, Pengyuan |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Based upon the results from extensive building monitoring and surveys on occupant's behaviors in a representative nine-story apartment building in northern China, building energy simulations were performed to evaluate the impacts of integrative retrofits implemented. Integrative retrofits required by the newer building energy standard produced significant heating-energy savings (i.e., 53%) when compared with baseline buildings commonly built in early 1980s. Taking into account district-heating-system upgrades as part of integrative retrofit measures, a representative apartment building was 66% more efficient than the baseline building. Contrary to expectation, little behavioral change was found in response to the provisions of monetary incentive, billing-method reform, or metering of heating energy use in individual apartment units. Yet this paper identified sizable energy savings potential if occupants' behavioral changes were to actually happen. This indicates that provisions of financial incentives or individual metering were insufficient for triggering substantial behavioral changes leading toward more energy savings in the current buildings. It is recommended that innovative energy policies, technology upgrades, and education would be needed to promote behavioral changes toward additional energy savings. Finally, measures and strategies to further enhance thermal integrity criteria (e.g., insulations of roof and balcony) are recommended in China's future building energy policy reforms. |
| `In' analytical Note | Energy Policy vol. , No.52; Jan 2013: p.667-676 |
| Journal Source | Energy Policy vol. , No.52; Jan 2013: p.667-676 |
| Key Words | Integrative Retrofits ; Residential Building Energy ; Policy Reform |