Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:970Hits:21488994Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID118177
Title ProperNon-tariff protectionist bias in majoritarian politics
Other Title Informationgovernment subsidies and electoral institutions
LanguageENG
AuthorRickard, Stephanie J
Publication2012.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Governments elected by majoritarian rules are, according to conventional wisdom, more protectionist than governments elected by proportional rules. However, existing tests of this claim examine only one possible form of trade protection: tariffs. This leaves open the possibility that governments in majoritarian systems provide no more protection than governments in proportional systems but simply use tariffs more often than other forms of trade protection. Does the protectionist bias in majoritarian politics extend beyond tariffs? The current study addresses this question by examining an increasingly important form of trade protection: subsidies. In a sample of 68 countries from 1990 to 2006, spending on subsidies is found to be higher in majoritarian systems than in proportional systems, holding all else equal. The implication is that the protectionist bias in majoritarian systems does in fact extend beyond tariffs.
`In' analytical NoteInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 56, No.4; Dec 2012: p.777-785
Journal SourceInternational Studies Quarterly Vol. 56, No.4; Dec 2012: p.777-785
Key WordsMajoritarian Rules ;  Conventional Wisdom ;  Trade Protection ;  Higher Majoritarian Systems