Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:491Hits:21055289Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID120609
Title ProperPalestine and the conceptual problem of implicit statehood
LanguageENG
AuthorVidmar, Jure
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)The General Assembly has accorded to Palestine the status of a non-member observer State in the UN. Some commentators have taken the position that Palestine's legal status as a State has thus been confirmed. This article draws on historical examples to demonstrate that the status of non-member State is not necessarily granted only to States. The recent vote in the General Assembly, therefore, neither confirmed nor altered the legal status of Palestine. But irrespective of this vote, Palestine nevertheless has a previously acquired international capacity to act like a State and can, inter alia, become a party to the ICC Statute and possibly bring a case to the ICJ. Such a capacity could be seen as an implicit confirmation of statehood. This article, however, demonstrates that State creation cannot be an implicit side-effect of international treaties or voting procedures in international organizations. Not even (full) membership of the UN is an exception.
`In' analytical NoteChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 12, No.1; Mar 2013: p.19-41
Journal SourceChinese Journal of International Law Vol. 12, No.1; Mar 2013: p.19-41
Key WordsPalestine ;  United Nation ;  Non Member State ;  International Treaties ;  International Organizations