Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2732Hits:24767379Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID121387
Title ProperMaintaining environmental quality while expanding biomass production
Other Title Informationsub-regional U.S. policy simulations
LanguageENG
AuthorEgbendewe-Mondzozo, Aklesso ;  Swinton, Scott M ;  Izaurralde, R Cesar ;  Manowitz, David H
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)This paper evaluates environmental policy effects on ligno-cellulosic biomass production and environmental outcomes using an integrated bioeconomic optimization model. The environmental policy integrated climate (EPIC) model is used to simulate crop yields and environmental indicators in current and future potential bioenergy cropping systems based on weather, topographic and soil data. The crop yield and environmental outcome parameters from EPIC are combined with biomass transport costs and economic parameters in a representative farmer profit-maximizing mathematical optimization model. The model is used to predict the impact of alternative policies on biomass production and environmental outcomes. We find that without environmental policy, rising biomass prices initially trigger production of annual crop residues, resulting in increased greenhouse gas emissions, soil erosion, and nutrient losses to surface and ground water. At higher biomass prices, perennial bioenergy crops replace annual crop residues as biomass sources, resulting in lower environmental impacts. Simulations of three environmental policies namely a carbon price, a no-till area subsidy, and a fertilizer tax reveal that only the carbon price policy systematically mitigates environmental impacts. The fertilizer tax is ineffectual and too costly to farmers. The no-till subsidy is effective only at low biomass prices and is too costly to government.
`In' analytical NoteEnergy Policy Vol. 57; Jun 2013: p.518-531
Journal SourceEnergy Policy Vol. 57; Jun 2013: p.518-531
Key WordsBioenergy ;  Environmental Policy ;  Environmental Policy Integrated Climate (EPIC)