Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1648Hits:20908353Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID124976
Title ProperIGO membership, network convergence, and credible signaling in militarized disputes
LanguageENG
AuthorKinne, Brandon J
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Existing studies of intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) and militarized conflict focus on dyadic counts of shared IGO membership. However, dyadic approaches are inconsistent with the basic properties of IGOs. Because IGOs are multilateral organizations, shared membership necessarily involves ties to third parties. This article employs network analytics to develop a novel explanation of how third-party IGO ties reduce militarized conflict. The analysis first examines the 'structural similarity' of states, defined by the extent to which states share similar patterns of IGO membership with relevant third parties. High levels of structural similarity indicate that states interact with a common set of IGO collaborators. The analysis then shows that micro-level changes in IGO membership effect changes in structural similarity, leading to the macro-level phenomenon of 'network convergence,' wherein states increasingly collaborate with the same third parties over time. Substantively, convergence results in increased overlap and integration between states' respective local networks of IGO partners. Because network convergence is costly, involving a combination of IGO-based accession, sovereignty, and alignment costs, it is unlikely to be pursued by purely exploitative state types. Consequently, convergence provides cooperative types with a mechanism for signaling a preference for cooperation over conflict. These credible signals in turn establish mutual trust among cooperators and effectively reduce the risk of militarized conflict. Extensive empirical analysis shows that, in fact, network convergence strongly correlates with a decline in militarized dispute initiations. The more that states collaborate with one another's IGO partners, the less likely they are to fight.
`In' analytical NoteJournal of Peace Research Vol.50, No.6; 2013: p.659-676
Journal SourceJournal of Peace Research Vol.50, No.6; 2013: p.659-676
Key WordsBargaining ;  Costly Signaling ;  Intergovernmental Organizations - IGOs ;  Multilateral Organizations ;  Structural Similarity ;  Militarized ;  Interstate ;  Militarized Disputes ;  Network Analysis ;  Militarized Conflicts


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text