Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1171Hits:21152830Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Journal Article   Journal Article
 

ID126421
Title ProperSystematically biased beliefs about political influence
Other Title Informationevidence from the perceptions of political influence on policy outcomes survey
LanguageENG
AuthorCaplan, Bryan ;  Crampton, Eric ;  Grove, Wayne A ;  Somin, Ilya
Publication2013.
Summary / Abstract (Note)Many scholars argue that retrospective voting is a powerful information shortcut that offsets widespread voter ignorance. Even deeply ignorant voters, it is claimed, can effectively punish incumbents for bad performance and reward them if things go well. But if voters' understanding of which officials are responsible for which outcomes is systematically biased, retrospective voting becomes an independent source of political failure rather than a cure for it. We design and administer a new survey of the general public and political experts to test for such biases. Our analysis reveals frequent, large, robust biases in voter attributions of responsibility for a variety of political actors and outcomes with a tendency for the public to overestimate influence, although important examples of underestimation also exist.
`In' analytical NotePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.4; Oct 2013: p.760-767
Journal SourcePolitical Science and Politics Vol. 46, No.4; Oct 2013: p.760-767
Key WordsPolitical Influence ;  Policy Outcomes Survey ;  Political Failure