| ID | 128056 |
| Title Proper | Ridding Syria of chemical weapons |
| Other Title Information | next steps |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Zanders, Jean Pascal ; Trapp, Ralf |
| Publication | 2013. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Preventing further use of chemical weapons in Syria will be achieved by their elimination rather than punitive airstrikes. Selective airstrikes, as repeatedly threatened by France, the United Kingdom, and the United States, would not have altered the military situation in the civil war, as the Syrian opposition forces and their backers had hoped.The airstrikes would most certainly not have degraded Syria's chemical weapons capacity to the point it would have become useless, and further chemical attacks would have remained a distinct possibility. Targeting chemical weapons storage sites risked releasing toxic clouds affecting combatants and noncombatants alike. Destroying other types of targets would have just added to the tally of conventional weapons casualties |
| `In' analytical Note | Arms Control Today Vol. 43, No.9; November 2013: p.8-14 |
| Journal Source | Arms Control Today Vol. 43, No.9; November 2013: p.8-14 |
| Key Words | Chemical and Biological Weapons - CBW ; Chemical Weapons ; Syria ; France ; United Kingdom - UK ; United States - US ; Arms Control ; Nuclear Weapons ; Conventional Weapons Casualties ; United Nations - UN ; Nuclear Proliferation ; Nuclear Disarmament ; Civil War ; Arms Strategy ; UNSC ; International Organization - IO ; International Cooperation ; International Relations - IR ; Weapons Policy ; Ridding Syria ; Syrian Controversy |