| ID | 131994 |
| Title Proper | Revisiting China's non-interference policy towards intrastate wars |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Chaziza, Mordechai ; Goldman, Ogen S |
| Publication | 2014. |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article evaluates, through statistical analysis, China's foreign policy of non-intervention, and answers the question of whether or not China has kept to its declared policy regarding intrastate wars relative to the other four powers that are permanent members of the UN Security Council. The evidence in this article suggests that the Chinese policy of non-interference was more a declaration than a policy. China significantly lower only from the United States and the USSR/Russia and differs solely in numbers of interventions, their extent, and diversity. Yet China is the only power that has not sent troops to interfere in intrastate wars. The country's share among the powers in supporting actors in intrastate wars is significantly less as time passes, although China exhibited no significantly different trends between the Cold War and the post-Cold War periods. It is, on the contrary, the United States and UK among the powers that have significantly increased their relative share of interference. |
| `In' analytical Note | Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol.7, No.1; Spring 2014: p.89-115 |
| Journal Source | Chinese Journal of International Politics Vol.7, No.1; Spring 2014: p.89-115 |
| Key Words | War ; Intrastate War ; China ; United States ; Cold War ; United Kingdom - UK ; Warfare ; Statistical Analysis ; Sino - US Relations ; US - China Relations ; United Nations - UN ; China's Foreign Policy ; Russia ; Bilateral Relations ; Trilateral Relations ; UN Security Council ; Russia - China ; Russia - US ; Chinese Policy ; Post-Cold War Space |