ID | 132468 |
Title Proper | Crimea and the international legal order |
Language | ENG |
Author | White, William W. Burke |
Publication | 2014. |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Putin's exploitation of the tension between the principles of non-intervention and self-determination is in the tradition of great-power interaction with international law. But Russia's interpretation sets dangerous precedents. Crimea is Russia's. The March 2014 referendum and Russia's subsequent annexation of Crimea are now events of history, even while the territorial borders and political future of the rest of Ukraine remain contested. Yet, as international attention has moved from Sevastopol to Kiev and more recent crises elsewhere, a key balance between two of the most fundamental principles of the post-Second World War international legal and political order remains at stake. |
`In' analytical Note | Survival : the IISS Quarterly Vol.56, No.4; August-September 2014: p.65-80 |
Journal Source | Survival : the IISS Quarterly Vol.56, No.4; August-September 2014: p.65-80 |
Key Words | International Law ; Territorial Disputes ; International Organisations - IO ; Human Rights ; Human Right Violence - HRV ; Human Right Watch - HRW ; Russia ; Ukraine ; Great Power ; History ; Territorial Borders ; Political Order ; International Attention ; Crimean Crisis ; Post Second - World War ; International Order ; Territorial Conflicts |