Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:1171Hits:21419785Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID139413
Title ProperDifference homeland security makes
Other Title Informationcomparing municipal corporate security in Canada and the United States
LanguageENG
AuthorWalby, Kevin
Summary / Abstract (Note)We explore what we refer to as municipal corporate security (MCS) units, a new form of security organization that differs significantly from public police and private contract security. Based on 36 interviews with MCS managers in 16 cities across Canada and in the United States, we examine how in-house security practices developed in private corporations are being transferred to municipal governments. We draw from the sociology of security governance to demonstrate how the Department of Homeland Security funding and policy has shaped MCS in the USA since 2001. The absence of similar centralized funding and policy for MCS in Canada has led to more piecemeal policy transfer, fewer links to federal government or national security, and more focus on nuisance policing than anti-terrorism. We also engage with the sociology of security consumption to argue that governments should be conceived as major buyers of security goods.
`In' analytical NoteSecurity Dialogue Vol. 46, No.3; Jun 2015: p.238-255
Journal SourceSecurity Dialogue Vol: 46 No 3
Key WordsHomeland Security ;  Corporate Security ;  Municipalities Security ;  Consumption Security ;  Networks Surveillance


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text