Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:4074Hits:20936339Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID139983
Title ProperRethinking income inequality in Japan and China (1995–2007)
Other Title Informationthe objective and subjective dimensions
LanguageENG
AuthorTay, Stephen
Summary / Abstract (Note)Most countries are grappling with the rising income inequality problem and many governments believe that it is important to reduce income inequality. This is because income inequality is associated with a variety of ‘negative’ outcomes (e.g., protest and low citizen well-being). This seemingly common-sense argument hinges on an untested assumption: Changes in a country’s level of income inequality affect how its citizens perceive and evaluate income inequality. This article argues that this is not theoretically plausible and shows with evidence from China and Japan from 1995 to 2007, that the income inequality of the context a person is embedded in does not systematically affect his or her perception and evaluation of income inequality. Instead, it is the individual socio-psychological factors that affect individual subjective evaluation of income inequality. Thus, while government officials in China and Japan are quick to implement policies that lower the objective dimensions of income inequality, more efforts should focus on subjective income inequality. Simply using the metric of objective income inequality indices (e.g., Gini ratio) as a measure of policy impact may blindside policy makers to the more important subjective income inequality, that is, how people perceive and evaluate everyday income inequality.
`In' analytical NoteChina Report Vol. 51, No.3; Aug 2015: p.230-257
Journal SourceChina Report Vol: 51 No 3
Key WordsChina ;  Inequality ;  Social Values ;  Japan Tolerance for Income Inequality ;  Subjective Social Status


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text