| ID | 140355 |
| Title Proper | Between dissolution and blood |
| Other Title Information | how administrative lines and categories shape secessionist outcomes |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Griffiths, Ryan D |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Common wisdom and current scholarship hold that governments need to stand firm in the face of secessionist demands, since permitting the secession of one region can set a precedent for others. For this reason governments will often choose blood rather than risk dissolution. I argue that administrative organization provides states with a third option. Those regions that represent a unique administrative type stand a much better chance of seceding peacefully. Moreover, large articulated states sometimes downsize by administrative category, which helps explain why governments will release one set of units without contest while preventing another set from doing the same. Finally, secessionist movements that do not cohere with any administrative region are the least likely to be granted independence. In sum, the administrative architecture of states provides governments with a means to discriminate between secessionist demands. I test this theory in a large-N study using original data on secessionist movements and administrative units between 1816 and 2011. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Organization Vol. 69, No.3; Summer 2015: p.731-751 |
| Journal Source | International Organization Vol: 69 No 3 |
| Key Words | Dissolution and Blood ; Administrative Lines ; Categories Shape ; Secessionist Outcomes |