| ID | 141456 |
| Title Proper | China's socialization in the International human rights regime |
| Other Title Information | why did China reject the Rome statute of the International Criminal Court? |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Tao, Jing |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | This article uses a hard law—the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court—to examine the depth of China's socialization in the international human rights regime and the relative weights of sovereignty and human rights norms in determining China's policy choices. It shows that the reasons for China's rejection of the Rome Statute are twofold. On the one hand, Chinese leaders have not fully internalized human rights norms, and they prioritize state sovereignty over human rights when making decisions. On the other hand, the legalized Rome Statute sets up an independent court with mandatory jurisdiction and grants the Prosecutor the ex officio right to investigate a crime. Such treaty provisions may have negative impacts on China's core sovereignty of territorial integration and regime security, thus imposing high sovereignty costs on China. Therefore, China resolutely voted against the Rome Statute, even if such an action made it a small minority outside the international mainstream. These findings indicate that China is still in a weak socialization stage and is not able to take on binding human rights and humanitarian obligations with high sovereignty costs. |
| `In' analytical Note | Journal of Contemporary China Vol. 24, No.96; Nov 2015: p.1092-1110 |
| Journal Source | Journal of Contemporary China Vol: 24 No 96 |
| Key Words | International Criminal Court ; Rome Statute ; International Human Rights Regime ; China's Socialization |