Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:4076Hits:20966473Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID142876
Title ProperChange and stasis
Other Title Informationthe institutionalisation of developing country mitigation in the international climate regime
LanguageENG
AuthorPrys-Hansen, Miriam ;  Franz, Benedikt
Summary / Abstract (Note)The ability of the parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to negotiate an effective agreement for the post-2020 period is highly dependent on whether developing countries should take on binding mitigation commitments. This analysis combines an historical with a discursive institutionalist perspective to trace the conflict around developing country mitigation that accompanies the climate change regime since its inception. The article shows that early decisions on the subject matter shaped the regime until now. At the same time, the discourse and more recent decisions concerning developing country mitigation indicate gradual changes nevertheless. In particular, the Conferences of the Parties in Bali 2007 and Durban 2011 produced outcomes that changed the institutional architecture of the regime significantly. The development of the climate regime regarding developing country mitigation is hence marked by both periods of change and stasis.
`In' analytical NoteDiplomacy and Statecraft Vol. 26, No.4; Dec 2015: p.696-718
Journal SourceDiplomacy and Statecraft Vol: 26 No 4
Key WordsClimate Change ;  Climate Change Regime ;  Developing Country Mitigation ;  International Climate Regime ;  United Nations Framework Convention


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text