ID | 144289 |
Title Proper | Comprehensive prohibition of nuclear weapons |
Other Title Information | an emerging international norm? |
Language | ENG |
Author | Steffek, Jens ; Kütt, Moritz |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | There have been calls for the abolition of nuclear weapons from the day they were invented. Over the last fifteen years, some indications can be found that such calls have been getting louder, among them Barack Obama's famous 2009 speech in Prague. In this article, we investigate if support for a comprehensive norm that would prohibit development, possession, and use of nuclear weapons is really growing. To assess the current status of that norm, we use the model of a “norm life cycle,” developed by Martha Finnemore and Kathryn Sikkink. We then analyze 6,545 diplomatic statements from the review process of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons as well as from the UN General Assembly First Committee on Disarmament and International Security, covering the years 2000 to 2013. The evidence shows that a comprehensive prohibition can be considered an emerging international norm that finds growing support among states without nuclear weapons and nuclear weapon states alike. Only a core group of states invoke the norm consistently, however. This leads us to conclude that the “tipping point” of the life cycle, at which adherence to a new norm starts to spread rapidly, has yet to be reached. |
`In' analytical Note | Nonproliferation Review Vol. 22, No.3-4; Sep-Dec 2015: p. |
Journal Source | Nonproliferation ReviewVol: 22 No 3-4 |
Key Words | Multilateralism ; Diplomacy ; Nuclear Disarmament ; Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons ; Nuclear Abolition ; United Nations |