Item Details
Skip Navigation Links
   ActiveUsers:2654Hits:20997210Skip Navigation Links
Show My Basket
Contact Us
IDSA Web Site
Ask Us
Today's News
HelpExpand Help
Advanced search

In Basket
  Article   Article
 

ID144700
Title ProperBoko Haram's attacks and the people's response
Other Title Informationa ‘fourth pillar’ of the responsibility to protect?
LanguageENG
AuthorPopovski, Vesselin ;  Maiangwa, Benjamin
Summary / Abstract (Note)This article examines the failure of the Nigerian government to exercise its responsibility to protect (R2P) populations from mass atrocities in the wake of Boko Haram's violent and persistent attacks against civilians in north-east Nigeria. After the abduction of 276 schoolgirls on 14 April 2014, the affected communities engaged directly in protecting their villages and families. Another murderous and devastating attack on Baga in January 2015 and the abduction of over 400 women in Damasak in March 2015 continued to expose the governmental failure to protect people at risk of losing their lives. This article examines the dynamics of the people's response to the crisis and investigates whether this response could be conceptually defined as a ‘fourth pillar’ of R2P, when a state – even in collaboration with the international community – is unable to live up to its R2P. Certainly, such a phantom ‘fourth pillar’ is symbolic and should not be used in any way by governments to re-delegate their first pillar primary R2P.
`In' analytical NoteAfrican Security Review Vol. 25, No.2; Jun 2016: p.159-175
Journal SourceAfrican Security Review Vol: 25 No 2
Key WordsTerrorism ;  Nigeria ;  Abduction ;  Mass Atrocities ;  Responsibility to Protect (R2P) ;  Boko Haram ;  Civilian Response


 
 
Media / Other Links  Full Text