| ID | 145110 |
| Title Proper | Same same or different? norm diffusion between resistance, compliance, and localization in post-conflict states |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Zimmermann, Lisbeth |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | Reactions to the promotion of human rights norms in post-conflict countries often clash with central assumptions of established theoretical approaches to norm diffusion. Socialization scholars expect either resistance when strong veto players are present and when resonance is missing, or extensive adoption of norms when states are vulnerable to transnational advocacy. Others predict decoupling processes when local capacities for implementation are scarce. Research on norm localization, in contrast, foresees the reinterpretation and modification of norms. The concept of localization, however, is often used as a catch-all category. Based on a new three-step model of translation into discourse, law, and implementation, I distinguish different types of translation. This conceptual approach to norm translation gives an interactional account of how certain types of translation emerge and shows the limits of “cures” for missing compliance proposed in existing approaches. The discussion draws on examples of human rights promotion in post-conflict Guatemala. |
| `In' analytical Note | International Studies Perspectives Vol. 17, No.1; Feb 2016: p.98-115 |
| Journal Source | International Studies Perspectives 2016-03 17, 1 |
| Key Words | Guatemala ; Norm Diffusion ; Localization ; Post-conflict State ; Human Rights Norm |