ID | 146190 |
Title Proper | Fetishization of sexual violence in international security |
Language | ENG |
Author | Meger, Sara |
Summary / Abstract (Note) | Recent international relations scholarship tends to view sexual violence, especially rape, as an exceptional—if not aberrant—phenomenon in war and armed conflict. Indeed, it often treats it as the sole form of gender-based violence capable of threatening international peace and security. I challenge the isolation of this particular form of gender violence in the study and governance of international security. I argue that the securitization of sexual violence produced its “fetishization” in international advocacy, policy, and scholarship. The stages of securitization operate as a process of fetishization by first, decontextualizing and homogenizing this violence; second, objectifying this violence; and third, affecting inter-unit relations through the “selling back” of sexual violence to actors involved in conflict. As such, my argument helps specify why securitization fails to adequately address an issue like sexual violence and often results in further retrenchment of disparate power relations. |
`In' analytical Note | International Studies Quarterly Vol. 60, No.1; Mar 2016: p.149-159 |
Journal Source | International Studies Quarterly Vol: 60 No 1 |
Key Words | International Security ; Sexual Violence ; Fetishization ; Disparate Power Relations |