| ID | 147907 |
| Title Proper | Status competition and territorial aggression |
| Other Title Information | evidence from the scramble for Africa |
| Language | ENG |
| Author | Barnhart, Joslyn |
| Summary / Abstract (Note) | When are states willing to engage in behaviors of little material or strategic value in order to assert their status? This article demonstrates that states are more likely to engage in acts of status assertion if their international standing has been called into question. Such status-challenged states seek opportunities to demonstrate their capabilities as well as their intention to maintain their current status. Status assertions often challenge the status and security of other states, leading these states to engage in more frequent acts of aggression. Evidence for these claims comes from detailed analysis of the Scramble for Africa at the end of the nineteenth century. France and Germany adopted expansionary policies in Africa because their great power status had been called into question. These policy shifts directly led Italy and Britain to adopt expansionary policies, leading to the eventual conquest of 95 percent of the African continent. |
| `In' analytical Note | Security Studies Vol. 25, No.3; Jul-Sep 2016: p.385-419 |
| Journal Source | Security Studies Vol: 25 No 3 |
| Key Words | International Organizations ; Africa ; Status Competition ; Territorial Aggression |